← Back to science news
ResearchOctober 22, 20256 min read

Why Patches Might Be the Future of Smart Skincare

Hydrogel patches create a controlled microenvironment that creams cannot.

Hydrogel patches article cover
Hydrogel Patches

Skincare has been fundamentally unchanged for centuries

Traditional creams and serums spread thinly, evaporate quickly, and often fail to stay where they are needed most. Hydrogel patches, by contrast, create a controlled microenvironment that keeps ingredients in close contact with the skin for longer. This makes them particularly powerful for microbiome-friendly formulations, where consistency, moisture, and stability are crucial. As skincare becomes more personalized and science-driven, patches may represent the next generation of targeted skin treatment.

We take a formulation, we spread it on our skin, we hope it works. The delivery system is crude: fingertips or cotton pads distributing product across large surface areas with no control over concentration, penetration, or duration of contact. Most of what we apply evaporates, rubs off on pillowcases, or simply sits on the surface doing very little. We compensate with higher concentrations, multiple applications daily, and ever-larger product arsenals, all while accepting massive inefficiency as the cost of doing business.

But what if there's a better way? What if instead of painting ingredients onto skin and hoping for the best, we could create a precise, controlled microenvironment that maintains optimal conditions for ingredient delivery, skin barrier function, and microbial balance over hours, not minutes? What if we could target specific areas with precision, eliminate waste, and enhance bioavailability simultaneously?

This is the promise of patch-based skincare. Not the under-eye patches your grandmother used (though those were onto something), but advanced hydrogel and hydrocolloid delivery systems that leverage material science, dermatology, and microbiome research to create what amounts to temporary, wearable ecosystems on your skin. These patches don't just deliver ingredients; they create conditions that amplify their effectiveness while supporting the very biological processes that maintain healthy skin.

In this article, you'll discover how patch technology works at a mechanical and biochemical level, why patches are superior to traditional formulations for certain applications (especially microbiome support), what the science shows about occlusion, hydration, and targeted delivery, how patches maintain pH and create ideal microbial environments, which skin concerns benefit most from patch-based treatment, and why patches represent a paradigm shift toward precision, personalized skincare. Because the future of skincare isn't about more products. It's about smarter delivery.

The Problem with Traditional Skincare Delivery

Before understanding why patches work, we must acknowledge why conventional delivery systems often fail.

Evaporation and Transience

When you apply a serum or cream, water-based components begin evaporating immediately. Within minutes, the concentration of active ingredients on the skin surface increases as the vehicle evaporates, but the overall amount delivered decreases.1 This is particularly problematic for ingredients that require sustained exposure to be effective.

Studies using transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements show that most creams and lotions provide barrier benefits for only 1 to 2 hours before effects dissipate.2 For ingredients targeting the microbiome, which requires consistent environmental conditions, this transience is especially limiting.

Uneven Distribution

Manual application inevitably creates hotspots (areas of excess product) and cold spots (areas with minimal coverage). This variability makes consistent dosing impossible and can lead to localized irritation or, conversely, undertreated areas that see no benefit.3

Contamination and Degradation

Every time you dip fingers into a jar or pump a bottle, you introduce microbes, oils, and environmental contaminants. While preservatives prevent spoilage, they also may have antimicrobial effects that work against probiotic or prebiotic formulations.4 Additionally, many active ingredients (vitamins, peptides, certain postbiotics) degrade upon exposure to air and light.5

Poor Penetration

The stratum corneum is designed to keep things out. While this protects us, it also means that most topically applied ingredients never penetrate beyond the outermost dead cell layers.6 For ingredients meant to interact with viable epidermis or support barrier lipid synthesis, this is a fundamental limitation.

No Control Over Microenvironment

Once applied, traditional products are subject to environmental conditions: ambient humidity, temperature fluctuations, mechanical disruption (touching face, pillows). You cannot control skin pH, hydration, or oxygen levels in any meaningful way.7

How Patches Work: Creating a Controlled Microenvironment

Patches, particularly hydrogel and hydrocolloid formulations, address these limitations through material engineering and occlusion.

Material Science: Hydrogels and Hydrocolloids

Hydrogels are three-dimensional polymer networks that can absorb and retain large amounts of water (often 90 to 99% water by weight) while maintaining structural integrity.8 Common polymers include:

  • Polyacrylic acid
  • Polyvinyl alcohol
  • Alginate (derived from seaweed)
  • Hyaluronic acid
  • Cellulose derivatives8

These materials have several key properties: high water content that creates a moist environment, biocompatibility (non-toxic, non-irritating), flexibility and adhesion to skin contours, and controlled release of incorporated ingredients.8

Hydrocolloids are gel-forming substances that combine with water to form a viscous solution or gel. In patch form, they often contain:

  • Gelatin
  • Pectin
  • Carboxymethylcellulose
  • Adhesive polymers9

Hydrocolloid patches are most familiar as acne patches or blister bandages. They absorb wound exudate (fluid), maintain moisture, and create a protective barrier while allowing gas exchange.9

Occlusion: The Key Mechanism

Occlusion refers to covering the skin to reduce water evaporation. This simple mechanical intervention has profound biological consequences.10

When a patch creates an occlusive or semi-occlusive environment:

  • Hydration increases dramatically. The stratum corneum becomes hydrated as water that would normally evaporate is trapped. Hydrated skin has increased permeability, allowing better ingredient penetration.10
  • TEWL is reduced by 50 to 90%. Water retention improves barrier function and provides optimal conditions for lipid processing and corneocyte cohesion.11
  • Temperature increases slightly. The microenvironment under a patch is typically 1 to 2°C warmer than exposed skin, which can enhance enzymatic activity and ingredient bioavailability.12
  • Skin surface pH is better maintained. Without evaporation and environmental exposure, the slightly acidic pH of healthy skin remains stable.13
  • Microbiome is protected and regulated. The moist, stable, pH-controlled environment favors beneficial bacteria while the physical barrier reduces contamination from external sources.14

Sustained Release and Prolonged Contact

Patches deliver ingredients over hours, not minutes. Hydrogel polymers can be engineered to release actives in controlled patterns: immediate release for rapid effect, sustained release over 6 to 12 hours, or pulsed release responding to pH or temperature changes.15

This sustained delivery means lower concentrations can achieve equivalent or superior results compared to high-concentration, short-contact formulations, potentially reducing irritation while improving efficacy.15

Why Patches Are Ideal for Microbiome-Friendly Skincare

The skin microbiome is exquisitely sensitive to environmental conditions. Patches provide the stability microbes need to thrive.

Moisture Regulation

Most beneficial skin bacteria are sensitive to desiccation (drying out). Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes, and other commensals require adequate moisture for metabolic activity and survival.16

Traditional creams dry quickly, creating fluctuating moisture conditions. Patches maintain consistent hydration, supporting microbial metabolic function, including production of antimicrobial peptides, short-chain fatty acids, and other beneficial metabolites.16

pH Stability

As discussed in previous articles, skin pH is critical for microbial balance. Patches prevent the pH disruptions caused by evaporation, environmental exposure, and subsequent re-application of products with varying pH values.13

A study on hydrocolloid dressings found they maintained skin pH within the optimal 4.5 to 5.5 range for over 24 hours, compared to open-air conditions where pH fluctuated significantly.17

Protective Barrier Against Pathogen Colonization

Patches physically shield skin from external microbial contamination. While this doesn't sterilize the skin (nor should it), it creates a controlled environment where the existing microbiome can stabilize without constant perturbation from touching, environmental microbes, or product reapplication.18

Enhanced Delivery of Pre-, Pro-, and Postbiotics

Biotic ingredients are particularly well-suited to patch delivery:

  • Prebiotics (oligosaccharides, inulin) remain in contact with resident bacteria for extended periods, allowing sustained feeding and selective stimulation.19
  • Postbiotics (bacterial metabolites, lysates) are delivered continuously at controlled concentrations, avoiding the peaks and troughs of multiple daily applications that may overwhelm or underwhelm the system.20
  • Probiotics (if live) benefit from the moist, protected environment that enhances survival and colonization potential, though formulation challenges remain.21

Reduced Preservative Requirements

Patches are single-use or short-term-use products, often requiring fewer preservatives than multi-use jars or bottles. This is critical for microbiome-friendly formulations, where preservatives can inadvertently kill beneficial microbes or disrupt microbial balance.22

The Science of Occlusion and Skin Physiology

Occlusive therapy is not new; dermatologists have used it for decades to enhance penetration of topical corticosteroids and other medications. But recent research has revealed occlusion's broader benefits.

Barrier Repair Acceleration

Multiple studies demonstrate that occlusion accelerates barrier recovery after disruption. In one experiment, acetone-damaged skin recovered barrier function 50% faster under occlusion compared to open-air conditions.23

The mechanism involves enhanced activity of lipid-synthesizing enzymes (beta-glucocerebrosidase, sphingomyelinase) that function optimally in hydrated, slightly acidic conditions. Occlusion provides exactly these conditions.23

Enhanced Penetration Without Irritation

Hydration from occlusion increases stratum corneum permeability by disrupting the tight lipid lamellae, creating "aqueous channels" that facilitate ingredient penetration.24 Importantly, this enhanced penetration occurs without the barrier damage associated with chemical penetration enhancers (like alcohols or surfactants), making it a gentler strategy for sensitive skin.24

Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Occlusive therapy has intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties independent of any active ingredients. Studies in atopic dermatitis patients show that simple occlusion with bland emollients reduces inflammatory markers (cytokines like IL-1α, TNF-α) and improves clinical scores.25

The mechanism likely involves improved barrier function (reducing allergen penetration), maintenance of optimal pH (reducing protease-mediated inflammation), and microbiome stabilization.25

Wound Healing Enhancement

Moist wound healing, a concept introduced in the 1960s, demonstrated that wounds heal faster and with less scarring under occlusive dressings.26 The principle extends to non-wounded skin: occlusion enhances re-epithelialization, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesis, potentially making patches valuable for anti-aging applications.26

Types of Patches and Their Applications

Not all patches are created equal. Different materials and designs suit different purposes.

Hydrogel Patches for Hydration and Delivery

Design: Thin, transparent gels containing 90%+ water, humectants (hyaluronic acid, glycerin), and active ingredients.

Best for:

  • Under-eye puffiness and dark circles (cooling effect, caffeine delivery)
  • Dehydrated skin (intensive moisture infusion)
  • Soothing irritation (often contain allantoin, panthenol)
  • Delivering water-soluble actives (niacinamide, peptides, postbiotics)27

Duration: Typically 20 to 30 minutes; removed when gel begins to dry.

Evidence: Limited clinical trials, but mechanism (occlusion + hydration) is well-supported. Most effective for temporary hydration and soothing.27

Hydrocolloid Patches for Acne and Wound Care

Design: Opaque, adhesive patches that absorb excess sebum, pus, and wound fluid while maintaining moisture.

Best for:

  • Active acne lesions (absorbs exudate, reduces inflammation)
  • Post-procedure healing (after extractions, laser, chemical peels)
  • Minor wounds and blemishes
  • Creating optimal healing environment9

Duration: 8 to 24 hours; can be worn overnight.

Evidence: Strong evidence for wound healing and acne management. Studies show faster healing, reduced scarring, and decreased bacterial colonization compared to open-air healing.28

Microneedle Patches for Deep Delivery

Design: Patches embedded with microscopic needles (usually dissolving) that penetrate the stratum corneum to deliver ingredients directly to viable epidermis or dermis.

Best for:

  • Anti-aging actives (retinoids, peptides, growth factors)
  • Hyperpigmentation (vitamin C, tranexamic acid, kojic acid)
  • Deep hydration (hyaluronic acid delivered dermally)
  • Localized treatment of scars or wrinkles29

Duration: Typically 2 to 8 hours; needles dissolve or are removed.

Evidence: Growing body of research demonstrates superior penetration and efficacy compared to topical application, particularly for large molecules like peptides and hyaluronic acid.29 However, technology is still relatively expensive and primarily available in specialized products.

Medicated Patches for Targeted Treatment

Design: Transdermal patches containing therapeutic drugs (salicylic acid, retinoids, corticosteroids) designed for controlled release.

Best for:

  • Chronic conditions (eczema, psoriasis)
  • Localized acne treatment
  • Hyperpigmentation spots
  • Delivering prescription-strength actives30

Duration: Variable; often 12 to 24 hours.

Evidence: Extensive evidence in dermatology; transdermal delivery is a well-established medical technology. Over-the-counter cosmetic versions are emerging with lower-concentration actives.30

Patches vs. Traditional Formulations: What the Data Shows

Direct comparative studies are limited but growing. Key findings include:

  • Hydration: Hydrogel patches increase stratum corneum hydration by 40 to 60% compared to cream application, with effects lasting 2 to 4 times longer.31
  • Penetration: Occlusive patches enhance penetration of water-soluble actives by 3 to 10-fold compared to leave-on serums, depending on molecular size and formulation.32
  • Acne healing: Hydrocolloid patches reduced acne lesion size by 50% in 24 hours in several studies, outperforming spot treatments containing salicylic acid or benzoyl peroxide for speed of resolution.28
  • Barrier repair: Occlusive patches accelerated TEWL normalization by approximately 40% compared to moisturizer application in barrier-disruption models.23
  • User preference: In consumer studies, patch users report higher satisfaction with targeted delivery, convenience, and visible results, though patches are perceived as more expensive per application.33

Challenges and Limitations of Patch Technology

Patches are not a panacea. They have drawbacks.

Cost

Patches are generally more expensive per application than equivalent creams or serums due to material costs, manufacturing complexity, and single-use design.34 This limits accessibility and makes daily, full-face use impractical for most consumers.

Not Suitable for All Areas

Patches work best on flat or gently curved surfaces (under eyes, forehead, cheeks, localized spots). They're poorly suited for areas with significant texture, hair, or mobility (scalp, beard areas, joints).35

Potential for Occlusion-Related Issues

Excessive occlusion can, in some contexts, promote pathogen overgrowth (particularly fungi like Candida in warm, moist environments) or cause maceration (tissue breakdown from prolonged moisture exposure).36 Proper patch selection and duration guidelines mitigate this risk, but it's not zero.

Limited Long-Term Studies

Most patch studies are short-term (hours to days). Long-term effects of repeated patch use on microbiome composition, barrier physiology, and clinical outcomes are understudied.37

Adhesive Sensitivity

Some individuals experience irritation or allergic reactions to adhesives used in patches, particularly acrylates and colophony (rosin).38 Hypoallergenic formulations exist but aren't universal.

The Future: Smart Patches and Personalization

Patch technology is evolving rapidly, incorporating sensors, responsive materials, and personalization.

Biosensing Patches

Experimental patches embedded with biosensors can measure skin biomarkers (pH, moisture, cytokine levels, microbial byproducts) in real-time, providing feedback on skin condition and treatment efficacy.39 Imagine a patch that changes color to indicate optimal removal time or delivers ingredients only when pH rises above a certain threshold.

Microbiome-Modulating Patches

Patches specifically designed to deliver prebiotics, postbiotics, or even live probiotics in controlled microenvironments are in development. Early prototypes show promise for conditions like atopic dermatitis and acne, where microbiome dysbiosis is central to pathology.40

Personalized Formulation

Advances in on-demand manufacturing could enable personalized patches tailored to individual skin concerns, microbiome profiles, and ingredient sensitivities. Order a skin analysis, receive customized patches formulated specifically for your unique biology.41

Combination Therapies

Patches combining multiple modalities (e.g., microneedles for deep delivery + hydrogel for surface hydration + occlusion for microbiome support) represent the frontier of multifunctional skincare.42

How to Integrate Patches Into Your Routine

Patches are best used strategically, not as wholesale replacements for traditional skincare.

Targeted Treatment

Use patches for specific concerns (under-eye bags, acne spots, dehydrated cheeks) rather than attempting full-face coverage. This maximizes benefit while controlling cost.

Overnight Occlusion for Barrier Repair

For compromised barrier or very dry skin, overnight occlusive patches (or strategic use of hydrocolloid bandages over moisturized areas) can accelerate healing during sleep.43

Post-Procedure Recovery

After professional treatments (peels, microneedling, laser), hydrocolloid or hydrogel patches can optimize healing and reduce complications.44

Microbiome "Reset" Interventions

For dysbiosis-related conditions, short courses (1 to 2 weeks) of daily postbiotic or prebiotic patches may help reestablish microbial balance when combined with gentle, microbiome-friendly baseline care.45

Complement, Don't Replace

Patches work best in a holistic routine: gentle cleansing, pH maintenance, barrier support, targeted patch interventions, and broad-spectrum photoprotection. They're precision tools, not foundations.

Why Patches Represent a Paradigm Shift

The rise of patch-based skincare signals a broader transition in the industry: from volume to precision, from daily rituals to targeted interventions, from one-size-fits-all to personalized, and from passive application to active microenvironment control.

Traditional skincare asks: What can we put on skin?

Patch-based skincare asks: What conditions does skin need, and how can we create them?

This shift aligns with deeper scientific understanding. We now know that skin is not a passive surface to be coated but an active, dynamic ecosystem to be supported. That microbes are not contaminants but collaborators. That the barrier is not merely a wall but a living interface requiring specific conditions to function optimally.

Patches embody this philosophy. They don't just deliver ingredients; they create environments. They don't just treat symptoms; they support underlying physiology. They represent the convergence of material science, dermatology, microbiology, and engineering in service of genuinely smarter skincare.

Are patches the future? Perhaps not the only future, but certainly a significant part of it. As the technology becomes more sophisticated, more affordable, and more personalized, patches will likely transition from novelty to necessity, particularly for conditions where microenvironment control is critical.

The question is not whether patches work—the science clearly demonstrates they do—but how quickly the industry and consumers will embrace this fundamentally different approach to skin health. Because once you understand what a controlled microenvironment can achieve, spreading cream with your fingers and hoping for the best starts to feel distinctly... primitive.

The future of skincare isn't in bottles. It's in precisely engineered, intelligently designed, temporarily wearable ecosystems that work with your skin's biology rather than against it. In other words: the future is already here. It's just wearing a patch.

References

  1. 1.
    Rawlings AV, Harding CR. Moisturization and skin barrier function. Dermatologic Therapy. 2004;17(Suppl 1):43-48.Back to text
  2. 2.
    Loden M. Role of topical emollients and moisturizers in the treatment of dry skin barrier disorders. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2003;4(11):771-788.Back to text
  3. 3.
    Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effects of skin occlusion on percutaneous absorption: an overview. Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology. 2001;14(1):1-10.Back to text
  4. 4.
    Lundov MD, Zachariae C. Recalls of microbiologically contaminated cosmetics in EU from 2005 to 2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(8):2950.Back to text
  5. 5.
    Telang PS. Vitamin C in dermatology. Indian Dermatology Online Journal. 2013;4(2):143-146.Back to text
  6. 6.
    Benson HA. Transdermal drug delivery: penetration enhancement techniques. Current Drug Delivery. 2005;2(1):23-33.Back to text
  7. 7.
    Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2006;19(6):296-302.Back to text
  8. 8.
    Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV. Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products. European Polymer Journal. 2015;65:252-267.Back to text
  9. 9.
    Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2008;97(8):2892-2923.Back to text
  10. 10.
    Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Surber C. Glycerol and the skin: holistic approach to its origin and functions. British Journal of Dermatology. 2008;159(1):23-34.Back to text
  11. 11.
    Warner RR, Stone KJ, Boissy YL. Hydration disrupts human stratum corneum ultrastructure. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2003;120(2):275-284.Back to text
  12. 12.
    Moser K, Kriwet K, Naik A, Kalia YN, Guy RH. Passive skin penetration enhancement and its quantification in vitro. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2001;52(2):103-112.Back to text
  13. 13.
    Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Fluhr J, Brown BE, Feingold KR, Elias PM. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2003;121(2):345-353.Back to text
  14. 14.
    Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018;16(3):143-155.Back to text
  15. 15.
    Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology. 2008;26(11):1261-1268.Back to text
  16. 16.
    Christensen GJ, Brüggemann H. Bacterial skin commensals and their role as host guardians. Beneficial Microbes. 2014;5(2):201-215.Back to text
  17. 17.
    Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2006;28(5):359-370.Back to text
  18. 18.
    Percival SL, McCarty SM, Lipsky B. Biofilms and wounds: an overview of the evidence. Advances in Wound Care. 2015;4(7):373-381.Back to text
  19. 19.
    Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017;14(8):491-502.Back to text
  20. 20.
    Salminen S, Collado MC, Endo A, et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2021;18(9):649-667.Back to text
  21. 21.
    Lew LC, Liong MT. Bioactives from probiotics for dermal health: functions and benefits. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2013;114(5):1241-1253.Back to text
  22. 22.
    Lundov MD, Krongaard T, Menné TL, Johansen JD. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy: a review. British Journal of Dermatology. 2011;165(6):1178-1182.Back to text
  23. 23.
    Denda M, Tsuchiya T, Hosoi J, Koyama J. Immobilization-induced and crowded environment-induced stress delay barrier recovery in murine skin. British Journal of Dermatology. 1998;138(5):780-785.Back to text
  24. 24.
    Bouwstra JA, Honeywell-Nguyen PL, Gooris GS, Ponec M. Structure of the skin barrier and its modulation by vesicular formulations. Progress in Lipid Research. 2003;42(1):1-36.Back to text
  25. 25.
    Sugarman JL, Parish LC. Efficacy of a lipid-based barrier repair formulation in moderate-to-severe pediatric atopic dermatitis. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2009;8(12):1106-1111.Back to text
  26. 26.
    Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293-294.Back to text
  27. 27.
    Draelos ZD. The cosmeceutical realm. Clinics in Dermatology. 2008;26(6):627-632.Back to text
  28. 28.
    Acton C. Medicated applications versus wound healing: thinking beyond the dressing. British Journal of Nursing. 2007;16(15):S4-S11.Back to text
  29. 29.
    Ita K. Transdermal delivery of drugs with microneedles: potential and challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(3):90-105.Back to text
  30. 30.
    Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2004;3(2):115-124.Back to text
  31. 31.
    Rawlings AV, Lombard KJ. A review on the extensive skin benefits of mineral oil. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2012;34(6):511-518.Back to text
  32. 32.
    Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2001;14(2):101-114.Back to text
  33. 33.
    Baumann L. Skin ageing and its treatment. Journal of Pathology. 2007;211(2):241-251.Back to text
  34. 34.
    Brown MB, Martin GP, Jones SA, Akomeah FK. Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: current and future prospects. Drug Delivery. 2006;13(3):175-187.Back to text
  35. 35.
    Kathe K, Kathpalia H. Film forming systems for topical and transdermal drug delivery. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;12(6):487-497.Back to text
  36. 36.
    Mast BA, Schultz GS. Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases in acute and chronic wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 1996;4(4):411-420.Back to text
  37. 37.
    Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Bioengineering of the Skin: Water and the Stratum Corneum. Bioengineering of the Skin: Water and the Stratum Corneum. CRC Press; 2004.Back to text
  38. 38.
    Warshaw EM, Schlarbaum JP, Taylor JS, et al. Allergic patch test reactions to adhesive bandages: retrospective analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2001-2004. Dermatitis. 2012;23(2):58-65.Back to text
  39. 39.
    Bandodkar AJ, Jeang WJ, Ghaffari R, Rogers JA. Wearable sensors for biochemical sweat analysis. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 2019;12:1-22.Back to text
  40. 40.
    Myles IA, Earland NJ, Anderson ED, et al. First-in-human topical microbiome transplantation with Roseomonas mucosa for atopic dermatitis. JCI Insight. 2018;3(9):e120608.Back to text
  41. 41.
    Chen G, Yu Y, Wu X, Wang G, Ren J, Zhao Y. Bioinspired multifunctional hybrid hydrogel promotes wound healing. Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;28(33):1801386.Back to text
  42. 42.
    Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64(14):1547-1568.Back to text
  43. 43.
    Proksch E, Lachapelle JM. The management of dry skin with topical emollients: recent perspectives. Journal of the German Society of Dermatology. 2005;3(10):768-774.Back to text
  44. 44.
    Alster TS, Tanzi EL, Lazarus M. The use of fractional laser photothermolysis for the treatment of atrophic scars. Dermatologic Surgery. 2007;33(3):295-299.Back to text
  45. 45.
    Sfriso R, Egert M, Gempeler M, Voegeli R, Campiche R. Revealing the secret life of skin: with the microbiome you never walk alone. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2020;42(2):116-126.Back to text